Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies
[EN] In this paper I focus on the fallacy known as Complex Question or Many Ques tions. After a brief introduction, in Sect. 2 I highlight its pragmatic dimension, and in Sect. 3 its dialectical dimension. In Sect. 4 I present two accounts of this fallacy developed in argumentation theory, Douglas W...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| Repositorio: | GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/150937 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/150937 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Presupposition Pragmatics Dialectical move Fallacy of complex question Fallacy of many questions Informative presupposition Persuasive presupposition 7205.02 Filosofía de la Lógica |
| Sumario: | [EN] In this paper I focus on the fallacy known as Complex Question or Many Ques tions. After a brief introduction, in Sect. 2 I highlight its pragmatic dimension, and in Sect. 3 its dialectical dimension. In Sect. 4 I present two accounts of this fallacy developed in argumentation theory, Douglas Walton’s and the Pragma-Dialectics’, which have resources to capture both its pragmatic and its dialectical nature. How ever, these accounts are unsatisfactory for various reasons. In Sect. 5 I focus on the pragmatic dimension of the fallacy and I suggest amendments to the accounts mentioned drawing on the study of the phenomenon of presupposition in theoretical pragmatics. I argue that the central notion in the defnition of the fallacy is that of an informative presupposition. In Sect. 6 I focus on the dialectical dimension of the fallacy. This dimension needs to be explicitly acknowledged in the defnition of the fallacy in order to distinguish it from a diferent, non-dialectical, fallacious argumentative move involving presuppositions. |
|---|