Relative Ontology and Science
Ontology is a knowledge about world as a whole. Union of ontology and science put somelimitations on ontology, that are caused by need to co-ordinate language of science with language of ontology. Main characteristic features of science are logic and mathematics. Union of ontology and science could...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:111970 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/111970 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Ontologia Ontologia relativa Ontology Relative ontology Categories Being Ontología Ontología relativa Categorías Ser |
| Sumario: | Ontology is a knowledge about world as a whole. Union of ontology and science put somelimitations on ontology, that are caused by need to co-ordinate language of science with language of ontology. Main characteristic features of science are logic and mathematics. Union of ontology and science could be successful only if ontology will have the same features. These requirements meets relative ontology based on a assumption that being is possible only through act of inequality, and non-being - through act of equality. Examining of inequality structure leads us to a need of considering in being act of equality as well. As a result we should refuse of considering problems of Being-Non-Being separately and proceed to united problem of Being-Non-Being. Inequality can be represented by mathematical subtraction. That allows to substantiate ontologically basic mathematical concepts: concepts of set and number. Mathematics become a part of ontology. Inequality is an idea. Equality is a matter. Being is a unity of matter and idea. Change of being can be fulfilled in two ways - material and ideal. Relation between both ways of change gives us three basic kind of being: somatic, anthropological and theological. In somatic being change is realized by means of material way. In anthropological being - both material and ideal ways are equally available. Theological being uses ideal way of change. Development of world proceeds from somatic - through anthropological - to theological one. |
|---|