Regional TV: a study of the regionalization process of TV Meio Norte (PI)
Globalization, over the last few years, has spread to all spaces and has given rise, among so many realities, to different ways of understanding the social context, given that the phenomenon has introduced new trends in the most varied fields – economic, ideological, historical, etc. In this environ...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Internacional de Folkcomunicação |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:uepg.br:article/21151 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/folkcom/article/view/21151 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | TV Regional Regionalização Tv Meio Norte Regional TV Regionalization TV Meio Norte Televisión regional Regionalización Televisión del Medio Norte |
| Sumario: | Globalization, over the last few years, has spread to all spaces and has given rise, among so many realities, to different ways of understanding the social context, given that the phenomenon has introduced new trends in the most varied fields – economic, ideological, historical, etc. In this environment, regionalization emerges as a viable path in a contemporaneity based on global actions, which safeguard ideals of valuing what is local. In this context, this article discusses TV Regional from the regionalization of TV Meio Norte - a station based in Teresina (PI). Adopting the methodologies of Bibliographic Research, Documentary Research and Case Study, it was analyzed how the regionalization process was constituted in the respective station. It can be said in this scenario that Grupo Meio Norte de Comunicação (GMNC) is perceived – and is called – as a vehicle of regional bias in Piauí, since it has a program that values the production and broadcasting of regional content, even though it is It is important to highlight that the interest in producing regional content is not genuine, as it serves; and strengthens the broadcaster's hegemonic discourses in the state and/or sustains partnerships created over the years. |
|---|