Deepening democracy: the path towards inclusive deliberation. A critical review of the contribution of Roberto Gargarella
Topic: This article carries out a comparative study from theory and a commented, reflective, amplifying and critical analysis of the work of Roberto Gargarella on inclusive democracy and the participatory mechanisms known as: "mini publics", lotteries and constitutions prepared by the citi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repositorio: | Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/66128 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/66128 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | democracy deliberation citizen participation inclusion Gargarella democracia deliberación participación ciudadana inclusión deliberação participação cidadã incluso |
| Sumario: | Topic: This article carries out a comparative study from theory and a commented, reflective, amplifying and critical analysis of the work of Roberto Gargarella on inclusive democracy and the participatory mechanisms known as: "mini publics", lotteries and constitutions prepared by the citizenship. Objective: It seeks to analyze this work in depth, to disseminate and highlight its findings, express the questions that arise from its reading, discuss it from other perspectives and add reflections on its proposal for democratic deepening from the incorporation of new spaces institutions for inclusive deliberation. Method: The methodology used is the in-depth case study and the comparative analysis between the case and the theory. Originality: From a deep interest in the subject addressed by Gargarella in his work, new impressions, questions, and projections are provided that the work raises when it is approached from other theoretical and analytical perspectives. Conclusions: Gargarella's work contributes; not without opening the way to questions, discussions, and controversies; an important study of a series of concrete experiences from which, it is assumed, it is possible to advance on the path of, on the one hand, facilitating the practice of debate and civic reflection, and, on the other, enabling the participation of all citizenship in public affairs. |
|---|