ARE LION TAMARINS (Leontopithecus: PRIMATES) SEXUALY DIMORPHIC IN REGARD TO BODY MEASUREMENTS?

ABSTRACT. Burity C.H.F., Pissinatti A. & Lacerda C.A.M. de. Are lion tamarins (Leontopithecus: Primates) sexualy dimorphic in regard to body measurements? [Os micos leões (Leontopithecus: Primates) são sexualmente dimorficos a pesar das medidas corporais?] Revista Brasileira de Medicina Vete...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Burity, Carlos Henrique Freitas, Pissinatt, Alcides, de Lacerda, Carlos Alberto Mandarim
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2010
País:Brasil
Recursos:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
Repositorio:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/863
Acesso em linha:https://bjvm.org.br/BJVM/article/view/863
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Tamarins de leão
Leontopithecus
corpo
morfometria
Lion tamarins
body and morphometry
Descrição
Resumo:ABSTRACT. Burity C.H.F., Pissinatti A. & Lacerda C.A.M. de. Are lion tamarins (Leontopithecus: Primates) sexualy dimorphic in regard to body measurements? [Os micos leões (Leontopithecus: Primates) são sexualmente dimorficos a pesar das medidas corporais?] Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 32(4):205-210, 2010. Escola de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Grande Rio, Rua Professor José de Souza Herdy, 1160, Duque de Caxias, RJ 25071-200, Brasil. E-mail: cburity@unigranrio.com.br The Leontopithecus genus comprises the following four recognized species: L. rosalia, L. chrysomelas, L. chrysopygus, and L. caissara, which are considered the largest genus in the Callitrichidae family. They occupy areas of the Atlantic Forest in Brazil, the former three species being critically endangered. Primates are sexually dimorphic in a range of morphological characteristics, such as body weight, fur, organs, and cranial, axial, and appendicular skeletons. This study assessed sexual dimorphism in body morphological characteristics of Leontopithecus kept in captivity. Body morphological variations were studied in a significant sample of the genus Leontopithecus. The analyses were performed aiming at testing possible sexual dimorphism. Welch’s approximate t test was used for assessing 13 body measurements, some of which were sexually dimorphic, such as chest perimeter, and arm, thigh, and foot lengths. No sexual dimorphism was evidenced for body weight in L. rosalia and L. chrysopygus. Body weight in L. chrysomelas, however, was dimorphic. As a whole, our study confirmed the lack of sexual dimorphism for body weight in Leontopithecus. On the other hand, it emphasized the findings regarding body weight in L. chrysomelas, as well as the significant differences found in the appendicular skeleton and chest perimeter in the sample studied.